MiniDora Trading Research
A public-safe window into the research desks behind Trading MiniDora: questions, evidence, desk disagreement, replay, and owner review. It explains how thinking forms without turning the site into a trading terminal.
Market context enters as research, not a trade idea.
Packets name proof, blockers, and counter-evidence.
Macro, equity, options, news, and risk can disagree.
Private review stays authenticated and read-only.
Research desk, not trading terminal
MiniDora Trading is a public-safe view of a private research workflow. It explains how desks form questions, attach evidence, expose uncertainty, and hold decisions for owner review.
Meet the desks
Specialized research desks compare context, evidence, scenarios, and risk gates.
Macro Desk
Rates, index context, breadth, calendar risk
Frames the market backdrop and marks where source confirmation is still thin.
Equity Desk
Company and sector evidence packets
Keeps company-level context separate from momentum claims and public summaries.
Options Desk
Volatility scenarios, skew, liquidity
Turns volatility notes into research artifacts without suggesting strategy execution.
Risk Desk
Gates, missing evidence, forbidden actions
Stops weak packets from becoming conclusions when sources degrade or evidence is missing.
News Desk
Catalyst watch, source freshness, event windows
Separates event context from urgency so public examples do not imply live private signals.
Crypto Desk
Digital asset samples, regime context, liquidity checks
Keeps crypto research in the same evidence-first lane without account or wallet context.
Evidence Desk
Provenance, blockers, replay trace
Links every important claim to a packet, a missing proof item, or a counter-evidence note.
How a signal forms
Signals are treated as review packets with blockers, not executable instructions.
Market context enters as a question
A signal starts as a research prompt, not as a trade idea.
Evidence and counter-evidence are named
The useful part is the visible proof, the contradiction, and what is still missing.
Desks disagree before confidence rises
Macro, equity, options, news, and risk lenses can disagree in public-safe sample form.
Owner review stays the gate
The public page describes the workflow; the private console remains owner-only.
Evidence and counter-evidence
Public examples show the shape of research without exposing private source artifacts.
Breadth sample plus second-source calendar check
Useful context, not enough for promotion.Valuation, source quality, or event-window contradiction
A strong claim needs explicit contradiction before owner review.Pending, degraded, partial, or verified
Missing or weak sources stay visible instead of hiding behind a score.Replay and review
A research day can be reconstructed without publishing private logs.
- A desk opens a research packet.
- Evidence Desk marks missing proof.
- Risk Desk keeps execution disabled.
- Owner reviews the packet in the private cockpit.
Safety boundary
The public page demonstrates methodology. The private console remains authenticated and read-only.
Private console preview
The owner cockpit organizes sample signals, desks, evidence gates, options scenarios, replay, and source health. Access is gated by the private owner session.
Owner review needs, source health, open questions
ResearchSignalsThesis, confidence band, evidence and counter-evidence counts
CompareDesksMacro, equity, options, risk, news, crypto, evidence disagreement
GatedInstrumentsInstrument-level summaries, history, source quality, risk flags
ScenarioOptions LabVolatility and scenario notes without strategy execution
Evidence traceEvidenceGate status, missing proof, provenance, blockers
AuditReplayHow desks formed or revised a research view
Run healthSystemData freshness, run health, degraded-mode explanation